Nowadays, circulated among the people Glanz And the United States on the infringement and acquisitions seem intensified the debate. Recently, high-priced acquisition of Galanz has played a small appliance business, the U.S. flag, and to petition the Commission to request attention. America’s also a small goods business does not take away all the reason to refuse the Glanz requirements. This event brings us a taste of China
Entrepreneur Participate in “competitive” and “wisdom.”
Chinese home appliance industry into a cycle of mutually defeating
Chinese home appliance industry, shopping, “Georgia and the U.S. struggle,” not the first time, of course, will not be the last. Over the years, competing home appliance industry emerged in a variety of weird.
“Competition”, which should contain two meanings: one is a big cake, a cake is allocated. Big cake is needed is the core technology and management level, can be assigned only the bigger the cake bigger market share. However, in the eyes of some Chinese entrepreneurs, competition seems to have never been “competitive” means, but “criticize” mean. As long as I can make you disappear, not that I share it? Why spend effort to do it big cake.
This seems not blame them. China itself is a huge market, but also has a virtually unlimited supply of low-cost labor advantage, as long as the price or make an issue of opponent’s fault, we can guarantee the expansion of market share, money and the unexpected. Some even said that the Chinese for thousands of years in scientific and technological level of agricultural society has not achieved great leap forward without the formation of an entrepreneurial class has a lot to do with this.
“Kaemi dispute” is the use of “rules” to the opponents trouble
A result, we are not difficult to understand the phrase an old saying in China, and the so-called “peer is the enemy.” Peer means “competition”, we have all seen too much of this Chinese national company of “competition”, they say that competition among national companies is “Wo Lidou.” And the Japanese that good at “Baotuan” natures as compared to, perhaps, we Chinese are too good “points” and bad “integration” of the.
Recent so-called “format war beauty,” is also nothing new.
Is none other than national enterprises were in full use of “rules”??? Formal rules and the “hidden rules” to the opponents some trouble.
On Galanz to buying the small appliance business in the United States argue, people’s voices seemed to split into two groups. Glanz is a hostile takeover was that, of course, some people say the U.S. is the obvious internal related transactions.
In fact, these arguments may not be important. If there is a hostile takeover bid Galanz suspected, the United States of the board of directors and management team can make the correct and fair assessment, to determine whether to transfer its shares to Glanz, rather than flatly refused. If the existence of the United States within the related party transactions, in accordance with the securities regulatory authorities can intervene in relevant laws and regulations.
And across the company’s competition is the R & D capability, management and coordination of the competitive industry
Discerning eye can tell at a glance, the two enterprises, “a battle of wits” with high-sounding reasons are, “rules” to strive for and maintain their own business interests. Not only the two enterprises, including China, many other companies, whether the same city or different place, during the “competition” are often doing this way.
In today’s global economic integration, the Chinese home appliance enterprises are facing not just competition from domestic fraternal companies, more competition will come from those multinational home appliance manufacturing “predators.” And across the company’s competition, not only cost and price competitiveness, but also R & D capability and management level of competition, industry competition and cooperation. How “going out” is a severe test of Chinese entrepreneurs. Therefore, the so-called “Xiong Dixi in the wall of their suits royal insult,” China’s household electrical appliance enterprises may be true that the seriously review the way the competition and ways of thinking of.
Commentators also pointed out that the “struggle between Georgia and the U.S.” hit the soft underbelly of China’s securities regulator. Undoubtedly, the competition of economic globalization and transnational entrepreneurs not only to China a challenge, should rise to reflect the relevant government departments. Guan Qingyou (Chinese Academy of Social Sciences Institute of Asia-Pacific Dr.)
I am China Toys Suppliers writer, reports some information about sleeveless polo shirt , scarface t shirts.
Tags: Into, Mutually
Source:
http://www.zuyt.com/2013/05/into-mutually-3/